By SETH JOSEPH
That is half 3 of Seth’s collection about Epic that has generated a lot curiosity and a bit controversy and we’re completely happy to host it on THCB. Part 1 and Part 2 have been revealed on Forbes earlier this yr.
In keeping with individuals within the room, Judy Faulkner’s imaginative and prescient on stage at Epic’s 2022 Consumer Group Assembly was epic, within the grandest sense of the phrase.
The corporate, which had grown as a unified medical and billing EHR system, was now laying out a roadmap by which it might be the digital entrance door for all issues client dealing with. A large panoply of capabilities together with, in line with Epic’s personal subsequent documentation, buyer relationship administration, supplier finders and on-line scheduling, on-line check-in, affected person monetary expertise, and lots of others.
Core to enabling all of this was shifting how sufferers work together with MyChart, the patient-facing software that permits people to entry their well being data.
Traditionally, every MyChart account was ‘tethered’ between a person and a hospital system and represented a easy portal for the person to view her data. If a person had been seen at a number of completely different hospital methods, then she would have a number of separate MyChart “situations”, or fully separate accounts and logins.
Now, Epic would ‘sew collectively’ the well being data and knowledge from completely different hospitals on behalf of the person in advancing what colloquially has been referred to as Epic’s ‘nationwide MyChart technique’, and allow sturdy new performance, creating compelling network effects between shoppers and hospitals.
There have been only some issues with Epic’s technique: first, many purchasers weren’t asking Epic to develop these capabilities; second, there have been startups and incumbents already offering many of those capabilities; and third, the corporate was in a race with a federal company, which was pushing for open requirements and entry that threatened Epic’s plans.
However for an organization that had slowly and steadily turn out to be the dominant well being know-how participant, whose employees conferences for a interval ended half-jokingly on a slide with the phrases “World Domination” on them, these issues have been all fixable.
The Promise Of Client Empowerment Instruments
As trendy historical past has demonstrated repeatedly, the flexibility to personal or management the buyer entry level for know-how generally is a strategic benefit. Apple’s smooth product designs, consumer expertise and tight ecosystem allow it to extract 30% of app developer revenues looking for to succeed in Apple’s customers. Google’s dominance in search has positioned it to be the entryway to the web for billions of shoppers no matter their final vacation spot, leading to extraordinary income progress and profitability.
In healthcare, the flexibility to meaningfully have interaction shoppers by way of know-how has lengthy held promise of fixing intractable issues, whereas additionally doubtlessly positioning the agency that figures out how to take action as a brand new locus of energy, equally as Apple and Google above. Triaging care choices for shoppers, navigating them to decrease price providers, facilitating funds, and offering trendy comfort choices are only a few of the lots of of use instances that consumer-facing know-how holds.
Key questions dealing with the corporations looking for to seek out healthcare’s holy grail are how greatest to do that and the place to begin, as client habits and sentiment towards healthcare has confirmed difficult for tech firms to determine.
For example, tech giants Microsoft and Google had each positioned vital bets on ushering a brand new period of client empowerment within the late-2000s, with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Well being. Often called affected person well being data (PHR), the 2 firms sought to allow shoppers to entry, mixture, retailer and doubtlessly share their well being data.
Looking back, Microsoft and Google’s efforts have been maybe a bit too early, as each initiatives have been shut down within the early 2010s, earlier than an ecosystem of well being know-how adoption, connectivity and capabilities that would have feasibly supported their imaginative and prescient. And earlier than shoppers had a compelling motive to alter their very own use of know-how to interact of their healthcare.
By 2022, nevertheless, the ecosystem had arrived. After the EHR Incentive program, greater than 90% of docs and hospitals had EHRs. The Covid-19 pandemic drove speedy adoption of telehealth by each physicians and shoppers. Roughly $100 billion in enterprise capital had flowed into well being know-how innovation. New worth transparency insurance policies have been shedding daylight into previously opaque and labyrinthine contracting practices. The twenty first Century Cures Act put tooth into driving interoperability, introducing information blocking as a civil penalty with million greenback fines. One business group revealed a report titled “Unbundling Epic: How The EHR Market Is Being Disrupted.” This creator proclaimed The EHR Is Dead.
If the EHR was useless or being disrupted, then each EHR firm wanted a survival plan.
Epic’s Worry And Unfair Benefit
In keeping with one hospital government, it was this backdrop that involved Epic’s management: with a speedy inflow of recent gamers and a shifting stability of energy, Epic is perhaps relegated to “simply being the pipes” whereas others capitalized on new alternatives. Given the corporate’s inflexible perception – confirmed right time and time once more – that it alone would ship one of the best outcomes for its prospects and shoppers, Epic thought such an end result can be a catastrophe.
To fight this threat, Epic by mid-2022 had a brand new technique with MyChart and community results on the coronary heart of it.
Prior up to now, Epic had allowed its hospital prospects to construct their very own consumer-facing purposes on prime of the MyChart chassis, or to usher in third-party options to sit down on prime of and combine with MyChart. To help this, Epic offered software program improvement kits (SDKs) to prospects, and allowed integration choices to 3rd social gathering distributors.
Supporting this innovation was essential to some Epic prospects. Particularly, bigger well being methods (usually these with extra sources and class) seen their consumer-facing capabilities as an essential option to differentiate themselves out there.
The brand new technique entailed driving adoption and utilization of MyChart (already one of the best recognized patient-facing software within the nation), creating new consumer-facing capabilities and pushing hospitals to make use of these, and capturing shoppers as their most well-liked software of selection.
In brief, Epic sought to develop its sphere of affect, from a place of market dominance over one sector of healthcare (hospital methods) into one other: shoppers.
To take action, Epic crafted a coherent coverage and set of techniques designed to influence hospitals to get on board with its imaginative and prescient, muscle out opponents, and affect regulation with the intention to obtain its ends.
Epic’s Techniques Leverage Its Strengths, However Increase Necessary Anti Aggressive Questions
As beforehand reported, Epic arguably has a monopoly place with its inpatient EHR amongst multi-hospital well being methods and tutorial medical facilities. Since that reporting, Epic has continued to realize market share; its software program is now used at hospitals accounting for 51% of all beds nationwide. As a number of hospital executives have put it in conversations, Epic is operating away with the EHR market.
The EHR could also be generally considered a medical software, however it could be extra correct to consider it because the hospital’s working system. The distinction may be essential: an software supplies workflow capabilities to attain a particular goal, whereas an working system acts as an interface between the consumer and {hardware} that controls the foundations by which purposes operate and the sources it has entry to.
Take into account that whereas docs and clinicians use the EHR as an software, it seems to be completely different from the hospital enterprise perspective: the EHR is the default system that its most extremely skilled, paid and busiest employees work together with day-after-day, rendering it the only most essential system; the information entered by clinicians shops affected person data and related info that’s used for mission-critical functions together with billing, reporting, and audit features; and accordingly, it’s the system which nearly each different software should accordingly combine with (and never vice versa).
Because the hospital’s ‘working system’, Epic’s nationwide MyChart technique begins out with pure built-in benefits versus patient-facing know-how opponents, together with:
- MyChart footprint: The federal Significant Use Program required hospitals to make use of EHRs that offered a affected person portal. At this time, Epic’s MyChart boasts between 190M and 300M client accounts, an unbelievable early benefit given the increasing utilization of private well being data.
- Key client infrastructure and integration: A affected person portal is of restricted utility to a client. However one which begins out built-in with the supplier system, permitting single-sign on, scheduling, messaging, telehealth and associated methods the buyer might need to work together together with her supplier, can present substantial worth.
- Hospital relationships and belief: The worth of having the ability to roll out new capabilities to present prospects representing 60% of all well being system spend at a single occasion (on this case, the 2022 Epic consumer group assembly) can’t be overstated. Nor can the years and, oftentimes, many years of trusted relationships that Epic has cultivated with its prospects.
In keeping with hospital and business executives, Epic is within the means of pulling all of those levers. And whereas some opponents might complain about these built-in benefits, the fact is that Epic is dominant within the inpatient EHR marketplace for good motive, and it’s a wise technique to leverage its present strengths throughout product, capabilities and relationships to advance its nationwide MyChart imaginative and prescient.
Nonetheless, a few of Epic’s different techniques, although they could show to be extremely efficient, elevate questions. Listed here are 4 particularly:
1. “You’re On Your Personal”: A yoyo can mean a silly or incompetent individual, a time period Epic has determined to use to a few of its prospects. On the firm’s 2022 consumer group assembly, Judy Faulkner launched the time period “you’re by yourself” (yoyo) to discuss with Epic hospital prospects who needed to take care of their very own digital front-door technique. Shifting from its historic stance of being agnostic as as to if hospitals used solely Epic’s MyChart or most well-liked to develop their very own consumer-facing technique that built-in with MyChart, Epic made clear it needed hospitals to forgo their very own technique and get on board with a extra Epic-controlled model of MyChart. In keeping with this need are Epic supplies that clearly display function divergence for patrons adopting its most well-liked ‘Personalised’ model of MyChart versus function discrimination for these ‘yoyo’ prospects.
2. Altering Price Construction For ‘Yoyos’ and Elevating Costs To Steer to MyChart: In keeping with executives from a number of methods who discovered themselves being referred to as ‘yoyos’, Epic additionally subsequently and unilaterally has tried to alter its charge construction for know-how and help prices associated to MyChart. Traditionally, Epic charged a flat charge to help hospitals who both constructed their very own consumer-facing purposes that built-in with MyChart or partnered with business distributors for a similar function. After it introduced its nationwide MyChart technique, nevertheless, Epic started notifying ‘yoyo’ prospects that it was shifting to a brand new pricing construction based mostly on the variety of shoppers the hospital served. A number of hospital executives talked about that this may enhance the related MyChart charges by a number of thousand %, from tens of 1000’s of {dollars} yearly to thousands and thousands; the choice was to keep away from these incremental charges by abandoning their very own consumer-facing methods and opting in to Epic’s nationwide MyChart technique.
In response to questions on these adjustments, an Epic spokesperson famous that MyChart charges themselves had not modified since 1999. With respect to know-how and help prices, the spokesperson famous, “With ‘You’re On Your Personal,’ prospects can select to license further instruments that enable their builders to embed elements of MyChart into their very own buyer purposes.”
3. Eliminating Preexisting Interoperability Entry: Epic had traditionally supported its ‘yoyo’ prospects, partly, by offering MyChart integration and interoperability sources to distributors that these prospects select to work with for consumer-facing purposes. With the introduction of its nationwide MyChart technique, nevertheless, Epic has begun limiting entry to these sources. In some instances, Epic has allegedly let slip to some distributors, together with these they’ve labored with for years collaboratively, that they’re now opponents, and that Epic can be “sunsetting” (eliminating) present interoperability sources and that the distributors wouldn’t have entry to future iterations of the identical sources.
Primarily based on a overview of an Epic e-mail response to a person requesting the standing of beforehand accessible sources, what Epic seems to be doing in some instances is withdrawing software programming interfaces (APIs) from its open.epic web site, and shifting these to its ‘Vendor Providers’ program. An preliminary problem for any vendor looking for to combine with Epic is that APIs in its Vendor Providers program usually are not revealed or discoverable. A vendor looking for to use to this program should first fill out and submit a questionnaire, however Epic supplies no steering on what the factors for inclusion or exclusion are, nor the way it determines what API sources can be accessible or to whom. This observe exposes Epic to claims that it could be choosing winners and losers.
4. Delaying Requirements (Which Could Drive MyChart Adoption): The Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise is a department of the U.S. Division of Commerce. Its IAL2 customary is meant to permit for distant id proofing, which is important to enabling a future by which people can request and entry their very own medical data from present well being info networks that suppliers use routinely. Enabling people to make use of digital purposes of their option to entry their data is a precedence for ASTP/ONC, the federal company chargeable for selling interoperability. Epic announced in August that they might help this functionality, however with a twist: the corporate helps the IAL2 customary to permit people to find the place they’ve acquired care, however to not request and retrieve their data.
Some business cynics have privately claimed that Epic’s stance will end in people nonetheless needing to have an present or create a brand new MyChart account, which can enhance charges Epic costs to hospitals (as MyChart charges are volume-based) and enhance lock-in of Epic’s ecosystem.
An Epic spokesperson flatly denies this, noting “Use of MyChart strictly for authorization to share knowledge by way of OAuth 2.0 [another technical standard for identity authorization] doesn’t increment any MyChart subscription counter, doesn’t end in any further costs to our prospects, and is unlikely to draw new customers to MyChart.”
————–
Individually, every tactic might help a reliable enterprise function. For example, whereas “yoyo” might sound a crude time period, it’s in step with Epic’s usually playful and artistic naming conventions. Altering its charge construction might replicate Epic making a course correction to a expensive means of supporting prospects, as an Epic spokesperson steered. And as business insider and analyst Brendan Keeler has famous, Epic is a leader amongst EHRs on the subject of enabling particular person entry providers, so it’s arduous to critique.
Taken altogether, nevertheless, the collective techniques are sufficient to have some business insiders and buyers involved that they’re anticompetitive.
Is Epic Unfairly Urgent its Excessive Floor Benefit?
Having grown organically since 1979 and solely previously decade turning into the chief in EHR, it’s potential that Epic’s insular tradition blinds it to its personal market energy and affect in adjoining markets.
If that’s the case, it could behoove Epic to replicate on points involving fellow tech giants who leveraged dominant market positions in a single enterprise to unfairly and illegally benefit themselves when dealing with know-how shifts and altering client conduct. Most related would be the Microsoft lawsuit, by which Microsoft was found to be illegally using its dominant place as an working system to exclude opponents within the rising net browser market. And the more moderen case in opposition to Google, by which Decide Mehta discovered the corporate acknowledged the ability of default placement and distribution to illegally safe and develop its place.
In Epic’s case, the corporate holds a dominant place because the hospital’s working system. By eradicating present APIs and interoperability sources to consumer-facing firms and altering charge constructions, it’s making it extra cumbersome and costly for hospitals to pick different patient-facing applied sciences, making MyChart the default path ahead. One end result is the notion that its techniques are exclusionary in nature and foreclose on innovation in an rising market. One other end result, additionally problematic for Epic, is diminished client selection and elevated direct prices (to hospitals) and oblique prices (to opponents and shoppers).
But, Epic arguably doesn’t must make use of these techniques to win. MyChart appears well-positioned to finish up as essentially the most sturdy, seamless and compelling ecosystem for shoppers because of Epic’s trusted relationships with hospitals, dominant market share and present (and rising) community results.
In the intervening time and absent any drive majeure stopping Epic from executing its plan, it seems to be like Epic’s client technique is more likely to end in community results that much more firmly entrench the corporate’s place and set up one other locus of energy. If profitable, Epic might discover itself ready like Apple, with the flexibility to extract a considerable income share from any developer looking for to entry shoppers for whom Epic can be the default “digital entrance door”.
Should you work in Verona Wisconsin, this can be a good factor. Perhaps too, if you happen to’re a client.
Seth Joseph is the Founder and Managing Director of Summit Well being Advisors
